Schema change is not backward-compatible with the previous application version.
Database reliability reviewer assigned with the relevant evidence bundle.
Independent release assurance
SignoffOps reviews high-risk software changes with AI, then routes uncertain cases to an independent expert—before they reach production.
Complements your existing GitHub or Azure DevOps workflow.
Schema change is not backward-compatible with the previous application version.
Database reliability reviewer assigned with the relevant evidence bundle.
CI passed
Release is safe
That gap is our job.
The assurance gap
Automation can tell you what passed. It rarely tells you what nobody thought to test.
The same team can run more tools, but it still owns the assumptions and blind spots behind the change.
Tests prove the scenarios they cover—not rollback safety, operational readiness, or missing evidence.
Familiarity makes teams faster, but it also makes hidden assumptions harder to see before release.
Not another DevOps platform
GitHub and Azure DevOps enforce the rules your team has configured. SignoffOps examines whether those rules—and the evidence behind them—are sufficient for the specific risk of this release.
YOUR EXISTING PLATFORM CONFIRMS
SIGNOFFOPS ADDS
Keep your existing pipeline. Add independent assurance only where the cost of failure justifies it.
GitHub tells you whether your configured controls passed. SignoffOps determines whether those controls were enough.
How it works
Share a non-sensitive pull request and the release context. Production access is not required.
AI maps the change surface, checks supplied evidence, and flags unsupported safety claims.
High-risk or ambiguous findings go to an independent specialist matched to the problem.
Get a clear Proceed, Proceed with conditions, or Hold decision—with reasons and evidence gaps.
Why independent
SignoffOps separates evidence collection from final judgment. Automation handles repeatable analysis. Qualified specialists handle consequential uncertainty.
Change mapping, checklist coverage, evidence extraction, risk routing, and report preparation.
Specialists examine context, challenge assumptions, and resolve high-impact ambiguity.
Decision rationale, evidence gaps, reviewer scope, and the conditions required to proceed.
See the method before you trust it
Our public repository contains deliberately flawed release scenarios so your team can inspect how the review workflow behaves before sharing a real change.
Open the GitHub demonstration$ signoffops assess PR-05
change_surface authentication
risk_level HIGH
evidence_status INCOMPLETE
decision_route EXPERT_REVIEW
→ Evidence bundle prepared
→ Security specialist requested
The direct answer
Those platforms execute checks, collect approvals, and enforce the policies your team has configured.
SignoffOps is the independent assurance layer above them. It consumes their evidence, identifies what may be missing, and routes unresolved release risk to the right specialist.
It does not replace your DevOps platform. It makes high-risk release decisions more defensible.
Founding pilot
Bring a non-sensitive pull request. We will agree the review scope and turnaround before you share access.